HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

State vets air brucellosis concerns


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


HELENA, Mont. -- State veterinarians from Montana, Idaho and Wyoming say cattle will continue to be plagued by a livestock disease as long as it remains prevalent in wildlife in and around Yellowstone National Park.

The state officials met Friday in Helena to discuss ways of jointly dealing with cases of brucellosis, a disease that can cause pregnant cows to abort their calves. The disease is dreaded by the livestock industry because it is expensive to eradicate and creates problems for ranchers attempting to export cattle.

Montana and Wyoming are in the midst of investigations to determine the cause of recent infections. Montana is losing its prized brucellosis-free status after a second case in less than two years. Wyoming could also lose its status if another herd tests positive.

The veterinarians said cattle in a danger zone around Yellowstone National Park will continue to get the disease as long as it remains in the park's bison and elk herds. They said more federal money has to be spent on a practical vaccine for wildlife, and the park must get serious about managing the herd.

All states face more cases until that happens, said Montana State Veterinarian Marty Zaluski.

"It is sad to admit that," Zaluski said at Friday's meeting. "But that is the situation."

Zaluski said the long-term goal has to include eradication of brucellosis in wildlife, adding he is hopeful that can be accomplished.

Federal officials, who face pressure from conservation groups to manage the bison as wild animals, have so far resisted the idea of vaccination. The state of Montana also receives negative public reaction for its bison roundups, which are intended to keep the animals inside Yellowstone.

The state veterinarians said bison are the largest repository of brucellosis. Elk, which migrate farther outside the park, are more likely to transmit it to cattle. But the farther elk are from Yellowstone, the less likely they are to carry the disease.

The state officials said they plan to meet on a regular basis with the hope of forming a united front for negotiating with federal and other state officials, who place export restrictions on the infected states.

The state veterinarians said they also want federal livestock regulators to update brucellosis rules, which were written to prevent transmission of the disease from one herd of cattle to another. They said it is unfair to penalize infections in herds that come from federally managed wildlife.

Ranchers said they feel the National Park Service has been ignoring the problems created when wildlife leave the park's borders. Until the situation changes, ranchers in states bordering Yellowstone will have to live with the threat of brucellosis, said Errol Rice, with the Montana Stockgrowers Association.

"We have to get ourselves out of this continual jeopardy," Rice said.


Previous   Next
Senate confirms Wyo U.S. attorney   EPA reviews stormwater policy rules

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 7 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Marion wrote on Jun 28, 2008 6:02 AM:

" NPS has a long history of doing what is politically correct at the time, that is why they removed wolves....all 142 of them. Now it is politically correct to maintain an active repository of brucelosis and pretend it is natural. It is also PC to maintain a far larger herd of bison than the park is able to handle. Even with the dramatic loss of elk within the park, the buffalo are over populated and over grazing. All of the remaining ungulates in the park looked to be in pretty tough shape this spring. "

john wrote on Jun 28, 2008 7:21 AM:

" Federal law stating that the park service is in control of the bison in Yellowstone prohibits what has to be done, bled test and dispose of the bison in the park that are suspect or positive,despite the fact that yellowstone is a part of Wyoming and the state vet has his hands tied because of the feds inability to help although it is the feds that want us to be brusilliosis misspelling is on purpose, free. does this make sense? "

Inky wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:04 AM:

" A profoundly dumb conclusion from some "smart" people.
We'll have brucellosis in wildlife as long as we have feedgrounds. There are sound reasons to believe that if the feedgrounds are shut down, the herds will disperse, and over time, the disease will "burn out."
State vets deal with livestock and have mistakenly assumed that wildlife can be treated as livestock as well. On so many levels, that is absurd.
It would be far more sensible, given the expense of dealing with feedgrounds and brucellosis, for the states to create a cattle free buffer zone around the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, with compensation to the ranch operators -- an approach currently in the work between Montana and the Church Triumphant. "

Dewd wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:06 AM:

" ... as if Wildlife have done something wrong, ...and the Cattlemen wear the red robes of Manifest Destiny that gives them utter dominion over fauna, fish , flora, and fowl in all things. Does anyone remember where the Brucella Abortus bacteria came from in the first place ? That the Elk, Deer, and Bison have been here since before recorded human history , but the alien exotic bovines arrived only yesterday to displace them unnaturally and uneconomically and with collateral damage ? That the solution is so simple and obvious the Cowboy Cardinals of the Sacred Cow Church refuse to see it ---move the cattle. (Duh! and Double Duh !!) Forgive me for I have sinned by speaking such heresy against Wyoming's divine ranch religion. "

Joe wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:34 AM:

" I'm tired of rancher playing victim on this. Cattlemen brought the disease to our wildlife, they lease and frequently overgraze our public lands at subsidized rates, they use water from federally subsidized water projects to irrigate thier hay, and on top of that, sportsmen foot the feed bill for elk in NW Wyoming to reduce grass competition to boot. I'm sorry but no more government hand outs to these welfare ranchers at the expense of our wildlife, water, and public lands. That said I'd still be willing to give one more handout in the form of a buy out of all the public land grazing leases within the brucellosis hot zone in and around Yellowstone in all three states. The definition of insantity is doing the same thing time and time again and expecting to get different resuls. DO IT! "

Nathan wrote on Jun 30, 2008 4:01 PM:

" I am with you Joe!
Marion the misguided policy wiped out over 60 percent of the herd of bison in Yellowstone this winter, are you willing to say they are STILL overpopulated? "

Ann wrote on Jul 1, 2008 3:22 PM:

" Brucellosis, Elk, Cattle, and Bison are NOT the enemy. APHIS is. It's time to corner APHIS and make them step up and update their thinking.
I can see Mad Cow slipping in unnoticed, if we all don't wake up.
The Park is NOT overgrazed, and anyone that thinks it is needs to get out and experience the REAL world for a change. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.