HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Residents oppose drilling proposal


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


CODY -- A proposal to drill the first new natural gas well in the Shoshone National Forest in more than a decade has drawn opposition from some nearby residents and an environmental group.

Windsor Energy has applied for a drilling permit for a new well near its existing Crosby well in Clark, where an August 2006 blowout resulted in contaminated groundwater and elevated levels of benzene in a private drinking water well.

The new well would be about a quarter-mile inside the forest boundary, one mile from the Crosby well site, said William Liedtke, vice president and corporate counsel for Windsor.

Hilary Eisen, public lands advocate in Cody for the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, said there was currently no energy exploration in the Shoshone National Forest, and it should be considered off-limits to such development in the future.

She said her group was "not against energy development or drilling, but some places shouldn't be developed because they are too special, and this is one of those places."

"Maybe this one well isn't a big concern, but what about the next well and the next well? We've already seen seven wells in the Clark area, and there's no full-field development plan," Eisen said.

She said forest managers should conduct a more thorough environmental review than the categorical exclusion being sought by Windsor.

"What are the effects of this? What is the future going to look like if you allow energy development on the national forest?" she said.

Eisen criticized Windsor's environmental record, and said the company should be focused on cleanup of the Crosby well blowout, rather than pursuing new wells.

An Aug. 18 letter from the U.S. Forest Service provided by Liedtke stated that Windsor's application had been deferred, pending a public scoping process that would help determine the appropriate level of required environmental review.

"Scoping is required for all Forest Service proposed actions, including those that appear like they might qualify for a categorical exclusion," said Marty Sharp, National Environmental Policy Act coordinator for the Shoshone Forest.

Sharp said a 30-day public comment period on Windsor's application would probably begin sometime in September. He said that while no energy exploration has taken place for years in the Shoshone Forest, it is not uncommon in other national forests.

Liedtke said it made no sense to seek a forestwide ban on drilling, but that each project should instead be assessed on its individual merits.

He said cleanup efforts in the Line Creek area are progressing, with air samples now being collected during test operation of an air sparge, a pump that bubbles air through contaminated groundwater to move contaminants into the air.

That system could be operating full-time within a month, once expected air quality permits are issued, said Michael Bullock, a manager with Terracon, an environmental consulting firm contracted to manage cleanup efforts.

Work also includes the use of a vapor extraction unit, which employs a vacuum pump to draw air through contaminated soil, Bullock said.

Some residents have criticized what they say is an unreasonably slow pace for cleanup work being done as part of a voluntary remediation program managed by the state Department of Environmental Quality.

Liedtke said all investigatory work on the cleanup project is complete, and a meeting will be scheduled sometime in the next two months to determine the best course for a final remediation plan.

He said the company plans to drill two more wells this year from the Crosby site, but the company has no comprehensive long-term plan in place for further drilling in the area, including in the Shoshone Forest.

Windsor has conducted extensive seismic surveys of the area and holds numerous leases.

A well Windsor drilled on private land near Heart Mountain last year under split-estate rights yielded a dry hole.

Landowner Jim Dager said he was happy with the remediation work done on his property and with the efforts of local contractors, including Rick Johnson and staffers from Iron Creek Energy.

But he said he has yet to be compensated by Windsor for surface damages and expenses in bringing electric power to the property which he said the company agreed to split.

Dager said company executives were "virtually impossible to deal with," and his calls to the company's Oklahoma offices have gone unreturned.

Liedtke said there had been recent turnover among staff members who handle such land claims, but that he would follow up on the issue.

Deb Thomas, a Line Creek resident and organizer for the Powder River Resource Council, said electric power was at maximum capacity in the area, and additional power would likely not be available soon for any future development.

Liedtke said that drilling crews would use diesel generators and that wells would not require electric power from the grid once they were completed and producing gas.


Previous   Next
Buffalo Bill Art Show & Sale draws serious collectors   Teton County bears behaving well

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 15 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

dabombgirl wrote on Aug 30, 2008 12:05 PM:

" So lets get this straight, an out of state company comes to our state and wants to drill on the Shoshone National Forest (one of Wyoming's greatest treasures and a major mecca for outdoor enthusiasts & tourists alike). You have got to be kidding me. Our state makes more money on that area in tourist dollars & from hunters, fishers, etc. that we would EVER see from an out of state drilling company who will just siphon-up all of our resources and skedadle back to Oklahoma leaving our precious national forest with surface damage, poor water quality, soil contamination and a funny smell in the air. They have already made a mess out of their other drilling site. I oppose the new well. "

flwtestr wrote on Aug 30, 2008 2:37 PM:

" Keep'm drilling! It's good for us that live and work in the state. "

PeakOilisNigh wrote on Aug 30, 2008 10:49 PM:

" Tourism is a dying industry based around cheap oil. In the end you will sell our soul just to afford the fossil fuels to make that trip to the local market to buy food. Get over your NIMBY. "

Mac wrote on Aug 31, 2008 8:16 AM:

" NOT IN
MY BACK YARD!
NOT IN MY BACK YARD!
NOT IN MY BACK YARD!
NOT IN MY BACK YARD!
NOT IN MY BACK YARD!
(repeat over and over and over)
Save the whale!
Save the spotted owl!
Save the (fill in the blank)!
Any place but here!
This is getting really old with these eco-idiots. "

hmmmmmm wrote on Aug 31, 2008 11:41 PM:

" isn't everybody yelling for the oil companys to drill the leases they already have? I wonder how many of the 78,000 leases not being drilled are for reasons like this. Adobe town and the wyoming range come to mind right here. Wish these nut cases would make up there minds!! "

America wrote on Sep 1, 2008 12:04 PM:

" In your back yard, in all our back yard! This country has to become self sufficient. We can no longer afford to ship our wealth over seas to countries that are paying for our distruction. It's time for everyone to make some sacrafices before it is to late. "

Johnny Boy wrote on Sep 2, 2008 10:55 AM:

" There are good energy companies who are respectful of landowners and public lands and bad one who do a lot of damage. Windsor's past record sounds sketchy and fly by night at best. "

Erin wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:19 AM:

" Gee, only a week or two ago everyone was lamenting the high cost of fuel?

Now, it's drill in someone else's backyard?

Hypocracy? Indeed! "

Logic wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:38 PM:

" Wyoming already makes too much natural gas. We don't have the pipeline capacity to deliver it all out-of-state..... remember? That's why we're getting only half the national price for our gas.... remember? So this latest drilling proposal is just a political fishing trip. We make too much gas already and the local price is being suppressed as a result. "

Realist wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:11 PM:

" Fact is that we have allowed thousands of new gas wells to be drilled in the last few years in Wyoming, yet our prices keep going up and up. We get a few jobs out of if for a short time, collect a little tax revenue, then bend over and take it in the rear. The energy industry is out of control; there is no natural gas shortage (in fact there is an abundance), yet the energy companies and futures traders manipulate the markets and continue to raise prices at an outrageous rate. We need to re-regulate the energy industry and close the Enron loophole before we have no affordable energy sources left and the energy companies and speculators have completely destroyed our economy. "

Hard Ball wrote on Sep 3, 2008 3:26 PM:

" They told us before, if we don't drill Jonah and the Powder River Basin, our gas prices could go way up. Well we did drill Jonah, and we did drill the Powder River basin.... and our gas prices have tripled in the last five years anyway. So the hell with 'em. All the out-of-state gas companies and energy brokers' can go try their luck in Colorado as far as I'm concerned. We've got the resources. They need us more than we need them. "

Sweetwater wrote on Sep 4, 2008 10:13 AM:

" I don't really care whose back yard it's in. I'd gladly host some wells in my own back yard, if it meant cheaper heating prices here. But it never does. It's all a load of baloney, to serve up cheap natural gas to California and Chicago. Despite the 40,000 new natural gas wells that have been drilled over the past six years here in Wyoming, our heating prices for homes and small businesses have gone up 260%. In Chigago, they've gone up 11%. These out-of-state gas companies are going to need a new lie, if they want people in Wyoming to believe it. "

Opportunity wrote on Sep 4, 2008 4:42 PM:

" If you are a state with good natural resources, there is simply no way around being exploited. That's just part of the game. Now having recognized that, you can either be a Saudi Arabia in this world, or you can be a Nigeria when you undergo your exploitation. Call me crazy, but I'd rather have a gold car than a tin hut. It's all in how you play it. That means raising the royalty price and squeezing the out-of-state companies. Like Saudi Arabia learned quickly..... they whine, but they always pay it. "

Elk Hunter wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:48 AM:

" Hunting is a Wyoming way of life! I'm not anti energy development but why would we allow an out of state company with a record of being disrespectful to public lands and private land owners to come in and ruin a part of the Shoshone National Forest. A forest which has some of the best hunting in Wyoming. "

Carbonic wrote on Sep 5, 2008 4:49 PM:

" These proposals to drill in National Forest are just political stunts. There is enough untapped natural gas in Wyoming's basins and BLM land to last another 100 years at least. I've been a geologist in Wyoming for over 40 years. I've never seen a company run into an economic need to drill on National Forest land. It's all ideology and button-pushing nonsense. They propose it, just to get a reaction. And then they act confused when local people actually react. Simple solution: Drill the basins out first. Quit acting stupid. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.