HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Bill: Put seat belts in buses


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


CHEYENNE -- A fifth-grade student at Sagewood Elementary School in Casper is the inspiration for a bill to require seats belts on school buses, according to a Natrona County legislator.

After a mock legislative session at the school, Sen. Kit Jennings asked the class what law needs to be passed in Wyoming. A girl in the back of the room raised her hand and said she believes seat belts are needed on school buses, Jennings said.

She said her mother always makes her buckle up in the family car, and she doesn't feel safe on a school bus because there are no seat belts.

Jennings said all but two students in the class agreed in a show of hands.

Prompted by that experience, Jennings is sponsoring a bill in the coming legislative session that would require seat belts on new buses.

Jennings, a Casper Republican, said in the past a school transportation official at the Wyoming Department of Education testified seat belts aren't of much use. National experts agreed at the time on grounds the school buses are built for safety, he said.

The school bus seat belt issue has not been before the Legislature in many years.

"It's something I've always thought we needed. To be honest, I didn't look into it that much as to why we didn't have them," Jennings said.

Jennings said the federal government has an enormous manual on seat belts on school buses, which suggests the federal government will require them eventually.

Senate File 52 would require seat belts only on new buses purchased by school districts, he said.

"It would not be fiscally responsible to require retrofitting of 1,800 school buses," Jennings said.

The requirement, however, would add to the cost of school buses, which is covered through the state School Foundation Program.

For a number of years, national transportation directors held the position that seat belts on school buses are not necessary because of the construction of the buses, said Mary Kay Hill of the Wyoming Department of Education.

"They still believe the construction of the buses is the first key to prevent injuries. But they have softened their stand as far as seats belts go," she added.

Given the research that seat belts could be useful and that children today are accustomed to buckling up, "We believe now that it could be an effective safety opportunity," Hill said.

The school districts, she said, have a regular schedule to replace school buses, so there would be some predictability about the cost.

If the bill gets through the Legislature, Jennings said he hopes the fifth-graders from Sagewood Elementary School can come to Cheyenne and watch Gov. Dave Freudenthal sign it into law.

He said he sent a copy of the bill in a bill jacket so the students can track its progress through the Legislature.

Contact Joan Barron at joan.barron@trib.com or by phone at 307-632-1244.


Previous   Next
Ranchers oppose Yellowstone bison relocation   Fremont Co. homicides rise

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 4 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 7 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Bubba wrote on Jan 3, 2009 9:18 PM:

" It's about time this balony that kids flying around in an overturned school bus are better off not wearing seatbelts comes to an end. Good grief, did anyone really believe that? "

Inky wrote on Jan 4, 2009 6:56 AM:

" So many conservatives are mired in the "nanny state" myth that they've lost common sense and cannot see that seat-belts in school buses or no-smoking in public spaces are incredibly positive for society.
It is a credit to Sen. Jennings that he can occasionally break out of that worn-out mold and do something smart. "

profit wrote on Jan 4, 2009 2:08 PM:

" It's about time. "

Gunner wrote on Jan 4, 2009 10:06 PM:

" I wonder what the acceptable death rate is for a school bus, maybe the national transportation directors could shead some light on this......

. "

flintknapper wrote on Jan 6, 2009 5:55 PM:

" Again the bias and ignorance of government comes to light. They tell you how to raise your kids, not to mention every other aspect of life. You can be fined for not having a child safety restraint while taking them to the bus, but when the kid gets on the bus, he/she is presumably safe because they are suddenly on a school bus?????This shows that the government is all about the control of the population. When they take our guns, it will be all over.Welcome to Nazi Amerika! "

SLS wrote on Jan 9, 2009 11:16 AM:

" Perhaps we can make them snap into place like those on a roller coaster. Otherwise, I wonder how the public thinks a bus driver could keep the seat belts on 35-50 kids at a time and drive also. "

2safeschools wrote on Apr 30, 2009 1:34 PM:

" Most are unaware that the school bus compartmentalization design implemented in the 1970's was not the engineers’ design but an altered design implemented by school principals and politicians. The original design included seat belts. The excuses asserted for no seat belts in school buses is as old as the arguments asserted against seat belts in cars in the 1950's. The nation's largest auto maker at that time, General Motors, declined to offer belts even as optional equipment. General Motors' "safety engineer," concluded that "seat belts are not essential for safe driving." Finally, with its 1956 model cars, Ford Motor Co. took the lead in offering optional equipment safety belts, as part of an emphasis on vehicle safety in its marketing of that year's new automobiles. Initial public demand for the belts was so high that it exceeded Ford's production plans (NOVA). International Corporation (IC) was the first school bus manufacture to offer seat belts as standard equipment on school buses. 28% of IC's production includes seat belts installed. Over 700 school districts have somehow managed with belts installed on their school buses. Some school districts in states using belts but not mandated include Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma Vermont and Virginia. I've driven the big school buses with belts not installed and also some with belts installed. Buses with belts installed are safer for everybody in and outside the bus, and provide safer environments on the bus by far over that of beltless buses, in my opinion. For more about this issue see this link:
www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/ContentViewer?objectId=090000648039f554&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.